Monday, 2 March 2015

Proffesional Practice: Director research

The director has two basic responsibilities: (1) to bring about a unified vision within the finished production, and (2) to lead others toward its ultimate actualisation. To meet these charges, the director must organize the realisation of his or her vision. The director must decide upon the interpretation to be given the play; work with the playwright (if possible), designers, and technicians in planning the production; cast and rehearse the actors; and coordinate all elements into the finished production.
To decide upon interpretation, the director must analyse the script to discover the play’s structure and meanings. Without understanding, the director cannot make choices. He or she seeks to know what the play is about and to understand each character in terms of both the script and the demands that character places upon the actor. The director must be able to envision the play’s atmosphere or mood and know how to actualise in terms of design and theatrical space. And, finally, the director must be able to see the play in terms of both physical and verbal action.
Before rehearsals begin, the director meets with the designers. At this time, the director not only gives his or her vision, but also listens to ideas. This highly creative intercourse results in a compromise which often is better than the original vision, for creative ideas interact with other creative ideas. Ultimately however, the director decides upon the interpretation to be used. The director may have specific requirements that would need to be presented to the designers before their work begins. The director must be aware of actor movement when viewing a design. Also, the director must have an idea of what kind of lighting would help enhance the mood of the production.
When casting a play, the director is aware of the physical demands of a character. Physical appearance must fit the character and must also be seen in relation to other characters. The director also tries to discern acting potential. In his book, Theatre, Robert Cohen describes traits that a director often looks for:
Depending on the specific demands on the play and the rehearsal situation, the director may pay special attention to any or all of the following characteristics: the actor’s training and experience, physical characteristics and vocal technique, suitability for the style of the play, perceived ability to impersonate a specific character in the play, personality traits which seem fitted to the material at hand, ability to understand the play and its milieu, personal liveliness and apparent stage “presence,” past record of achievement, general deportment and attitude, apparent cooperativeness and “directability” in the context of an ensemble of actors in a collaborative enterprise, and overall attractiveness as a person with who one must work closely over the next four to ten weeks.
The director’s most time-consuming task is to rehearse the actors. The director must be organized, for he or she focuses the entire cast during this time. The director’s medium is the actor in space and time. Space is defined by the acting area and the setting while time is defined by the duration of the production and the dynamics of the drama The director must be able to see the actor as a person and strive to draw out that person’s potential. Consequently, the director constantly must be sensitive to both the needs of an actor and at the same time think of ways to meet those needs in positive ways.
Directors tend to follow an established process during rehearsals. Initially, the director usually has the actors read through the script. The read-through allows the director to discuss his or her vision, character motivation, and interpretation which will help the actors begin to see their characters in terms of a unified understanding. The director then blocks the actors. Blocking are an actor’s basic broad movements which serve as the physical foundation of the actor’s performance. The director indicates movement such as entrances and exits and positions actors onstage. Often, this step takes preplanning. During this stage, interpretation begins to be worked out, for blocking is linked to a character’s motivation to move or position.
The next step would be to work on detail, which helps an actor discover his or her character. Detail includes working out stage business, which is an actor’s small-scale movement. For instance, making coffee, answering a phone, putting on shoes, or adjusting a tie are pieces of stage business. Hopefully, the actor will originate much of his or her own stage business.
Motivation and detail continue while time is spent devoted to lines. Interpretation of dialogue must be connected to motivation and detail. During this time, the director is also concerned with pace and seeks a variation of tempo. If the overall pace is too slow, then the action becomes dull and dragging. If the overall pace is too fast, then the audience will not be able to understand what is going on, for they are being hit with too much information to process.
Also, eventually, the actors will need to be off script. Once off script and the lines are memorized well enough that the actor is not thinking “What is my next line?” then the rehearsals enter into a very rewarding stage of development. For actors cease to read their part and truly make it living. They also discover new avenues of interpretation once off script.
Late in the rehearsal process, the director often has the actors run through the production. A runthrough gives the actors a sense of continuity from one scene to the next. At this stage, the director usually does not stop the actors but takes notes to give after the scene is finished.
Nearly all elements of the production — actors, scenery, lights, sound — come together at the technical rehearsal. The stage manager, prop crew, running crew, light and sound board operators all rehearse their various parts to play. Hopefully, light and sound cues will be set before the first technical rehearsal begins. A dress rehearsal is a technical rehearsal with costumes and makeup. At this time, the director must give over the production to the actors and technicians. The final dress rehearsal should be the same as a performance.
Nobody is more useless on opening night performance than the director. The director’s job is over at this time and is often lost and feeling alone. The best the director can do is to wish people well, sit, watch the performance, know every flaw during that performance, and sweat it out.

 http://www.edubuzz.org/dgs_drama/the-role-of-the-director/

Saturday, 21 February 2015

Studio Production: Script 2

Here is the 2nd draft of the script:



Myself and roxanne had a meeting where we edited the draft together and made changes based on feedback from teacher helen.

Stay safe,

Helen

Wednesday, 11 February 2015

Studio Production: CAFT Meeting

In Preparation for the CAFT meeting i created a storyboard so i could know the kind of set design ideas i could advise the set designers. I took pictures that interested me and sets that were already out there to help them to create a concept that could work best for the show.



Stay safe

Helen

Monday, 9 February 2015

Studio Production: Casting

I already had an idea in my head for 2 of the panelists and had spoken to Danny about the possibility of Jamie, who i had worked with on the digital news project, as auditioning for presenter.
The 2 people i thought about auditioning were Jordan and Beth. I work with them both and know they are very opinionated people, and although they are friends, they often disagree on a lot of things and therefore i felt they would be good additions to the show. I got them both to come in for auditions and felt that they had really strong personalities and handled the camera well. I wanted to utilise there time by having them have their group interview at the same time. So we had them do their's together, as some of the production team weren't sure about having them on the show together as friends as they might not clash so i felt that having them interview together would showcase their differences more. It worked excellently and the team really liked them and we decided to choose them as panelists. This left one spot available.

We also interviewed a art student who wasn't in the age range for the target audience and wasn't knowledgeable about the topics other than art. His views were very middle of the road and was easily swayed with his opinion. This meant he wasn't a good fit for our show. We then waited for a few other applicants but they were no shows.

The last person we had in was Roo. He was a friend of Kate's and was really keen to be involved. As we knew he would be up against beth and jordan we decided to really go hard on him during the interview to see if he could handle a lot of people taking one side against him and he did brilliantly. He was very informed about the topics and seemed genuinely interested and motivated to stick up for his view point. We were really pleased to ask him to be our final panelist.

As for the role of presenter we skyped all of our applicants. Two were really knowledgable and really passionate about the topics. However our favourite - Dave - had a really difficult schedule to work around and as he wasn't available on the rehearsal days we felt it wouldn't be a wise choice to hire him. We then Skyped Jamie. I knew he worked well under live conditions and could handle the pressure but i wasn't sure if he would be able to handle the topics we were covering. Jamie explained although he wasn't as up to date on the topics as we would like he was prepared to go away and do his own research and read anything we gave him, in order to be the presenter we needed. He also had a schedule which meant he would be free for our hans sessions so we could practice with him and mold him to what we needed and get him used to interrupting the debates.

After a vote, we decided to go with jamie and therefore had our line up.

Stay safe,

Helen

Friday, 30 January 2015

Studio Production: Research

Grafitti:

http://restorationresponse.com/services/grafitti/
http://www.charnwood.gov.uk/files/documents/graffiti_the_facts/factsheet-graffitithefacts.pdf
" and it is estimated that it costs the UK over £1 billion per year to clean up."

Fake bansky
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art/news/he-fooled-the-newspapers-he-fooled-the-locals-but-now-cumbrias-banksy-imposter-is-coming-unstuck-10014275.html

Art or vandalism:
http://iml.jou.ufl.edu/projects/fall07/sanchez/art.html

Should graffiti be legal?:
http://www.debate.org/opinions/should-graffiti-be-legal

Domestic Violence:

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/142701/guide-on-definition-of-dv.pdf
"The 2011/12 Crime Survey for England and Wales found that young people aged 16 to 19 were more likely to suffer partner abuse in the last year than any other age range2."

http://www.mankind.org.uk/factsmalevicitms.html

Body image/ Photoshop:

http://hellogiggles.com/photoshop-deadly-thought

http://www.healthyplace.com/blogs/buildingselfesteem/2012/08/self-esteem-in-girls-the-medias-role/
"The Dove Self-Esteem Fund reveals 71% of girls with low self-esteem feel that their appearance doesn’t measure up; including “not feeling pretty enough, thin enough, stylish enough or trendy enough,” compared to the images they are exposed to in popular media. Add in the fact 80% of adult women polled said images of women on TV and in movies, magazines, and ads make them feel insecure about appearance, and we clearly see a pattern. "


Voting:

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/nov/25/politics-young-people-apathy
"In the last general election, young people between the ages of 18 and 25 were more likely to become first-time abstainers than first-time voters. Only 37% of 18-24-year-olds voted in the 2005 general election. Most significant of all, 76% of young people didn't feel they could "influence government decisions"."

http://blog.whatscotlandthinks.org/2014/12/many-16-17-year-olds-voted/
"More precisely, according to ICM’s survey, 75% of 16 and 17 year olds voted, compared with 54% of 18-24 year olds and 72% of 25-34 year olds. The turnout in all three groups is markedly lower than the estimate for 35-54 year olds (85%) and those aged 55 and over (92%)."

Stay safe,

Helen

Tuesday, 27 January 2015

Studio Production: Meeting 2

Here are the production minutes from the 2nd meeting. 



Things are coming along now but we still need to confirm our topics. I think after the VT team do their test shoot for the gaming it will help to decide if we can go with that topic or not.
Im going to do some more research on the game hatred and will speak to the makers about getting a demo sent.

Stay safe,

Helen